[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200213091633.GA849@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:16:33 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the module name to be consistent
with older kernel
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 01:59:46PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:50 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:37:20PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> > > Commit cd221bd24ff5 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Allow building as a module")
> > > introduced a side effect that changed the module name from arm-smmu to
> > > arm-smmu-mod. This breaks the users of kernel parameters for the driver
> > > (e.g. arm-smmu.disable_bypass). This patch changes the module name back
> > > to be consistent.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iommu/Makefile | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/iommu/{arm-smmu.c => arm-smmu-common.c} | 0
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > rename drivers/iommu/{arm-smmu.c => arm-smmu-common.c} (100%)
> >
> > Can't we just override MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX instead of renaming the file?
>
> I can do that. But on the other hand, the "mod" in the module name
> arm-smmu-mod.ko seems to be redundant and looks a little bit weird.
> Wouldn't it be cleaner to make it just arm-smmu.ko?
I just didn't fancy renaming the file because it's a pain for backports
and why does the name of the module matter?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists