linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: hv: Introduce hv_msi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:14:07 +0800
From:   Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:     Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Murray <amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: hv: Introduce hv_msi_entry

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:18:01AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > From: linux-hyperv-owner@...r.kernel.org
> > <linux-hyperv-owner@...r.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Boqun Feng
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> > 
> > +union hv_msi_entry {
> > +	u64 as_uint64;
> > +	struct {
> > +		u32 address;
> > +		u32 data;
> > +	} __packed;
> > +};
> 
> Just a small thing: should we move the __packed to after the "}" of
> the union hv_msi_entry ?
> 

Actually, in TLFS header, it's common to put the "__packed" inside the
union, rather than after the union. It makes sense because union is
different than struct: the alignment requirement of a union is already
decided by the "as_*" member, so no need for "__packed" attribute.

> Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>

Thanks!

Regards,
Boqun