lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:54:13 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> To: peng.fan@....com Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andre.przywara@....com, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:58:49AM +0800, peng.fan@....com wrote: > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> > > SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports. Since there is no > standardized id, we need to use vendor specific id. So > add into devicetree binding doc. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > index f493d69e6194..dacc62dc248b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node. > protocol identifier for a given sub-node. > - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size > associated with it. > +- smc-id : SMC id required when using smc or hvc transports IIUC, "arm,smc-id" is preferred more. Why did you drop "arm,scmi-smc" ? -- Regards, Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists