linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9103f638-b733-5f4d-1a64-ee35cbfd8236@sholland.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:45:50 -0600
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq_wake

All,

On 1/17/20 3:33 PM, Samuel Holland wrote:
> The pinctrl irqchip may be connected to an irqchip that implements the
> .irq_set_wake callback, such as the R_INTC on A31 and newer sunxi SoCs.
> In order for GPIOs to be able to trigger wakeup, the IRQ from the
> pinctrl to the upper irqchip must also be enabled for wakeup. Since the
> kernel's IRQ core already manages the "wake_depth" of each IRQ, no
> additional accounting is needed in the pinctrl driver.

Ping. Any comments on these two patches?

Thanks,
Samuel Holland