linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:14:03 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq_wake

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:45:50PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> All,
>
> On 1/17/20 3:33 PM, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > The pinctrl irqchip may be connected to an irqchip that implements the
> > .irq_set_wake callback, such as the R_INTC on A31 and newer sunxi SoCs.
> > In order for GPIOs to be able to trigger wakeup, the IRQ from the
> > pinctrl to the upper irqchip must also be enabled for wakeup. Since the
> > kernel's IRQ core already manages the "wake_depth" of each IRQ, no
> > additional accounting is needed in the pinctrl driver.
>
> Ping. Any comments on these two patches?

For both,

Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)