[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200214131403.uxx76djg34rugm55@gilmour.lan>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:14:03 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq_wake
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:45:50PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> All,
>
> On 1/17/20 3:33 PM, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > The pinctrl irqchip may be connected to an irqchip that implements the
> > .irq_set_wake callback, such as the R_INTC on A31 and newer sunxi SoCs.
> > In order for GPIOs to be able to trigger wakeup, the IRQ from the
> > pinctrl to the upper irqchip must also be enabled for wakeup. Since the
> > kernel's IRQ core already manages the "wake_depth" of each IRQ, no
> > additional accounting is needed in the pinctrl driver.
>
> Ping. Any comments on these two patches?
For both,
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists