[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200214235607.13749-25-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:56:02 -0800
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/30] rcu: Optimize and protect atomic_cmpxchg() loop
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
This commit reworks the atomic_cmpxchg() loop in rcu_eqs_special_set()
to do only the initial read from the current CPU's rcu_data structure's
->dynticks field explicitly. On subsequent passes, this value is instead
retained from the failing atomic_cmpxchg() operation.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 5ee5657..4146207 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -342,14 +342,17 @@ bool rcu_eqs_special_set(int cpu)
{
int old;
int new;
+ int new_old;
struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu);
+ new_old = atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks);
do {
- old = atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks);
+ old = new_old;
if (old & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR)
return false;
new = old | RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK;
- } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&rdp->dynticks, old, new) != old);
+ new_old = atomic_cmpxchg(&rdp->dynticks, old, new);
+ } while (new_old != old);
return true;
}
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists