[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200214235607.13749-26-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:56:03 -0800
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/30] rcu: Tighten rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected() check
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
The ->nocb_lock lockdep assertion is currently guarded by cpu_online(),
which is incorrect for no-CBs CPUs, whose callback lists must be
protected by ->nocb_lock regardless of whether or not the corresponding
CPU is online. This situation could result in failure to detect bugs
resulting from failing to hold ->nocb_lock for offline CPUs.
This commit therefore removes the cpu_online() guard.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 3846519..70b3c0f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1579,8 +1579,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(struct rcu_data *rdp,
static void rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
- if (rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist) &&
- cpu_online(rdp->cpu))
+ if (rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist))
lockdep_assert_held(&rdp->nocb_lock);
}
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists