[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200214084358.GA25266@kedthinkpad>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:43:58 +0200
From: Andrey Lebedev <andrey.lebedev@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: wens@...e.org, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Andrey Lebedev <andrey@...edev.lt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: sun7i: dts: Add LVDS panel support on A20
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:52:18AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > This will create a spurious warning message for TCON1, since we
> > > adjusted the driver to tell it supports LVDS, but there's no LVDS
> > > reset line, so we need to make it finer grained.
> >
> > Yes, I can attribute two of the messages in my dmesg log [1] to this
> > ("Missing LVDS properties" and "LVDS output disabled". "sun4i-tcon
> > 1c0d000.lcd-controller" is indeed tcon1). And yes, I can see how they
> > can be confusing to someone.
> >
> > I'd need some pointers on how to deal with that though (if we want to do
> > it in this scope).
>
> Like I was mentionning, you could introduce a new compatible for each
> TCON (tcon0 and tcon1) and only set the support_lvds flag for tcon0
Can you give me an idea how that compatible might look like?
tcon0: lcd-controller@...c000 {
compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon", "allwinner,lvds";
or
tcon0: lcd-controller@...c000 {
compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon", "allwinner,tcon0";
? Or something completely different?
--
Andrey Lebedev aka -.- . -.. -.. . .-.
Software engineer
Homepage: http://lebedev.lt/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists