linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: sun7i: dts: Add LVDS panel support on A20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200214085351.2whnfyulrmyex2va@gilmour.lan>
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:53:51 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Andrey Lebedev <andrey.lebedev@...il.com>
Cc:     wens@...e.org, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Andrey Lebedev <andrey@...edev.lt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: sun7i: dts: Add LVDS panel support on A20

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:43:58AM +0200, Andrey Lebedev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:52:18AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > This will create a spurious warning message for TCON1, since we
> > > > adjusted the driver to tell it supports LVDS, but there's no LVDS
> > > > reset line, so we need to make it finer grained.
> > >
> > > Yes, I can attribute two of the messages in my dmesg log [1] to this
> > > ("Missing LVDS properties" and "LVDS output disabled". "sun4i-tcon
> > > 1c0d000.lcd-controller" is indeed tcon1). And yes, I can see how they
> > > can be confusing to someone.
> > >
> > > I'd need some pointers on how to deal with that though (if we want to do
> > > it in this scope).
> >
> > Like I was mentionning, you could introduce a new compatible for each
> > TCON (tcon0 and tcon1) and only set the support_lvds flag for tcon0
>
> Can you give me an idea how that compatible might look like?
>
> 		tcon0: lcd-controller@...c000 {
> 			compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon", "allwinner,lvds";
>
> or
>
> 		tcon0: lcd-controller@...c000 {
> 			compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon", "allwinner,tcon0";
>
> ? Or something completely different?

Something like

&tcon0 {
    compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon0", "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon";
};

&tcon1 {
    compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon1", "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon";
};

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)