[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mfgq_HF8-uGxY0Qh6aN320CLBBX3gu-uXVSH6Y=ZvXOqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:31:30 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] irq: make irq_domain_reset_irq_data() available
even for non-V2 users
pt., 14 lut 2020 o 10:02 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> napisaĆ(a):
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> writes:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > irq_domain_reset_irq_data() doesn't modify the parent data, so it can be
> > made available even if irq domain hierarchy is not being built.
>
> Yes, it can be made available, but WHY?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Duh, I forgot to clarify this. After my previous submission, Marc
suggested I use irq_domain_reset_irq_data() in the unmap() callback
for the simulator domain. I noticed I can't do this because I don't
select the V2 irq domain API, so I added this patch.
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists