[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eeuxh789.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:02:30 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] irq: make irq_domain_reset_irq_data() available even for non-V2 users
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> writes:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> irq_domain_reset_irq_data() doesn't modify the parent data, so it can be
> made available even if irq domain hierarchy is not being built.
Yes, it can be made available, but WHY?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists