[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200215032259.GA21048@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:22:59 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Robert Walker <robert.walker@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf cs-etm: Fix synthesizing instruction samples
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:41:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> This patch series is to address issues for synthesizing instruction
> samples, especially when the instruction sample period is small enough,
> the current logic cannot synthesize multiple instruction samples within
> one instruction range packet.
Thanks a lot for Mike's review.
Hi Mathieu/Suzuki, I'd like get your green light before we can ask
Arnaldo to help merge this patch set. Thanks!
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists