[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkyw__tnn5FC=ro-LuaOibP19UhGvPPndjvJDodxcj6Ukg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:30:37 -0700
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Robert Walker <robert.walker@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf cs-etm: Fix synthesizing instruction samples
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 20:23, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:41:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > This patch series is to address issues for synthesizing instruction
> > samples, especially when the instruction sample period is small enough,
> > the current logic cannot synthesize multiple instruction samples within
> > one instruction range packet.
>
> Thanks a lot for Mike's review.
>
> Hi Mathieu/Suzuki, I'd like get your green light before we can ask
> Arnaldo to help merge this patch set. Thanks!
At the very least, please wait 10 days before pinging maintainers
about patch reviews. I have never failed to review coresight patches
and this time is no different.
>
> Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists