[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200217154402.GA20241@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 23:44:02 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Robert Walker <robert.walker@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf cs-etm: Fix synthesizing instruction samples
Hi Mathieu,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:30:37AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 20:23, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:41:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > This patch series is to address issues for synthesizing instruction
> > > samples, especially when the instruction sample period is small enough,
> > > the current logic cannot synthesize multiple instruction samples within
> > > one instruction range packet.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for Mike's review.
> >
> > Hi Mathieu/Suzuki, I'd like get your green light before we can ask
> > Arnaldo to help merge this patch set. Thanks!
>
> At the very least, please wait 10 days before pinging maintainers
> about patch reviews. I have never failed to review coresight patches
> and this time is no different.
Understand and sorry for hurry pushing. Take your time for reviewing
and no rush :)
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists