[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40ab03bb-4746-4414-f4e2-60740d539f3e@wizzup.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:09:22 +0100
From: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@...zup.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc: BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Mattias Jacobsson <2pi@....nu>,
"Darren Hart (VMware)" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Input: add `SW_MACHINE_COVER`
Hi Sebastian,
On 14/02/2020 15:38, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:02:47PM +0100, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
>> This event code represents the state of a removable cover of a device.
>> Value 1 means that the cover is open or removed, value 0 means that the
>> cover is closed.
>
> This is the opposit of what is being stated everywhere else. It does
> not really matter, but it must be used consistently :)
Oh, my bad. Indeed, value 1 means that the cover is closed, will fix.
>> This can be used to preempt users removing a removable mmc card or even
>> the battery, allowing userspace to attempt to safely unmount a card.
>
> I would drop this sentence, since its very specific to the N900. The
> name is generic enough to e.g. also apply for desktop machines, which
> sometimes have a cover switch for doing a shutdown (because of poor
> airflow when open).
Fair enough.
>> ---
>
> Missing Signed-off-by.
Will add - thanks.
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cheers,
Merlijn
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists