linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:46:08 +0200
From:   Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
        lorenzo@...nel.org, toke@...hat.com,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: page_pool: API cleanup and comments

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:41:33AM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:28:49 +0200
> Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/include/net/page_pool.h b/include/net/page_pool.h
> > index cfbed00ba7ee..7c1f23930035 100644
> > --- a/include/net/page_pool.h
> > +++ b/include/net/page_pool.h
> > @@ -162,39 +162,33 @@ static inline void page_pool_use_xdp_mem(struct page_pool *pool,
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > -/* Never call this directly, use helpers below */
> > -void __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
> > -			  unsigned int dma_sync_size, bool allow_direct);
> > +void page_pool_release_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page);
> >  
> > -static inline void page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool,
> > -				      struct page *page, bool allow_direct)
> > +/* If the page refcnt == 1, this will try to recycle the page.
> > + * if PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV is set, it will try to sync the DMA area for
> > + * the configured size min(dma_sync_size, pool->max_len).
> > + * If the page refcnt != page will be returned
> 
> Is this last comment line fully formed?

Yes, but that dosen't mena it makes sense!
Maybe i should switch the last sentence to sometning like:
"If the page refcnt != 1, page will be returned to memory subsystem" ?

Thanks
/Ilias
> 
> 
> > + */
> > +void page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
> > +			unsigned int dma_sync_size, bool allow_direct);
> > +
> > +/* Same as above but will try to sync the entire area pool->max_len */
> > +static inline void page_pool_put_full_page(struct page_pool *pool,
> > +					   struct page *page, bool allow_direct)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>   Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>   MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
>   LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
>