lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:40:44 +0300
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] io_uring: add splice(2) support

On 2/17/2020 6:18 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
>> +static int io_splice_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>> +{
>> +	struct io_splice* sp = &req->splice;
>> +	unsigned int valid_flags = SPLICE_F_FD_IN_FIXED | SPLICE_F_ALL;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (req->flags & REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	sp->file_in = NULL;
>> +	sp->off_in = READ_ONCE(sqe->off_in);
>> +	sp->off_out = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
>> +	sp->len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
>> +	sp->flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->splice_flags);
>> +
>> +	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(sqe->ioprio) || (sp->flags & ~valid_flags)))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Why is ioprio not supported?

Because there is no way to set it without changing much of splice code.
It may be added later

BTW, it seems, only opcodes cares about ioprio are read*/write*.
recv*() and send*() don't reject it, but never use.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ