[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <847739f8-6f54-cf64-54b8-94707944850b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:00:13 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, atalambedu@...dia.com, tiwai@...e.com,
viswanathl@...dia.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com, sharadg@...dia.com,
rlokhande@...dia.com, mkumard@...dia.com, dramesh@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based I2S
driver
14.02.2020 17:05, Jon Hunter пишет:
>
> On 29/01/2020 03:41, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> The !RPM case isn't supported by Tegra anymore in upstream kernel. I'm
>> trying to help to make yours driver better and gave you reasons to
>> remove the unneeded code, while you're keep saying that "there is no
>> harm to retain it", which is not a reason to clutter up the code. I
>> don't feel that it's worthwhile to continue arguing here.
>
> On further review, it does look like a reasonable argument to get rid of
> this now completely. Like you see less clutter and the soc-core should
> ensure that the card is shutdown before unloading. OK, so fine with me.
And the RPM core ensures that state is synced on disable, sorry if I
didn't make it clear before.
+1 for less clutter :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists