linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based I2S driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:00:13 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, atalambedu@...dia.com, tiwai@...e.com,
        viswanathl@...dia.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com, sharadg@...dia.com,
        rlokhande@...dia.com, mkumard@...dia.com, dramesh@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based I2S
 driver

14.02.2020 17:05, Jon Hunter пишет:
> 
> On 29/01/2020 03:41, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>> The !RPM case isn't supported by Tegra anymore in upstream kernel. I'm
>> trying to help to make yours driver better and gave you reasons to
>> remove the unneeded code, while you're keep saying that "there is no
>> harm to retain it", which is not a reason to clutter up the code. I
>> don't feel that it's worthwhile to continue arguing here.
> 
> On further review, it does look like a reasonable argument to get rid of
> this now completely. Like you see less clutter and the soc-core should
> ensure that the card is shutdown before unloading. OK, so fine with me.

And the RPM core ensures that state is synced on disable, sorry if I
didn't make it clear before.

+1 for less clutter :)