linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: Print "disabled by bios" only once per host

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:51:00 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Erwan Velu <e.velu@...teo.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Erwan Velu <erwanaliasr1@...il.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: Print "disabled by bios" only once per host

On 19/02/20 17:53, Erwan Velu wrote:
> 
> 
> I've been testing the ratelimited which is far better but still prints
> 12 messages.

12 is already much better than 256.  Someone else will have an even
bigger system requiring a larger delay, so I'd go with the default.

Paolo

> I saw the ratelimit is on about 5 sec, I wonder if we can explicit a
> longer one for this one.
> 
> I searched around this but it doesn't seems that hacking the delay is a
> common usage.
> 
> Do you have any insights/ideas around that ?
> 
> 
> Switching to ratelimit could be done by replacing the actual call or add
> a macro similar to  kvm_pr_unimpl() so it can be reused easily.