[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219181654.GB2312@sol.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:16:54 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, davem@...emloft.net,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, will@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: arm64: CE: implement export/import
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:00:37PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> When an ahash algorithm fallback to another ahash and that fallback is
> shaXXX-CE, doing export/import lead to error like this:
> alg: ahash: sha1-sun8i-ce export() overran state buffer on test vector 0, cfg=\"import/export\"
>
> This is due to the descsize of shaxxx-ce larger than struct shaxxx_state off by an u32.
> For fixing this, let's implement export/import which rip the finalize
> variant instead of using generic export/import.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/crypto/sha2-ce-glue.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c
> index 63c875d3314b..dc44d48415cd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c
> @@ -91,12 +91,32 @@ static int sha1_ce_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
> return sha1_base_finish(desc, out);
> }
>
> +static int sha1_ce_export(struct shash_desc *desc, void *out)
> +{
> + struct sha1_ce_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
> +
> + memcpy(out, sctx, sizeof(struct sha1_state));
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sha1_ce_import(struct shash_desc *desc, const void *in)
> +{
> + struct sha1_ce_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
> +
> + memcpy(sctx, in, sizeof(struct sha1_state));
> + sctx->finalize = 0;
> + return 0;
> +}
Can you use '&sctx->sst' instead of 'sctx' so that we aren't relying on the
'struct sha1_state' being located at the beginning of the struct?
Likewise for SHA-2.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists