[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200221195549.GA29499@Red>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 20:55:49 +0100
From: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@...libre.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, davem@...emloft.net,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, will@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: arm64: CE: implement export/import
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:16:54AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:00:37PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > When an ahash algorithm fallback to another ahash and that fallback is
> > shaXXX-CE, doing export/import lead to error like this:
> > alg: ahash: sha1-sun8i-ce export() overran state buffer on test vector 0, cfg=\"import/export\"
> >
> > This is due to the descsize of shaxxx-ce larger than struct shaxxx_state off by an u32.
> > For fixing this, let's implement export/import which rip the finalize
> > variant instead of using generic export/import.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/crypto/sha2-ce-glue.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c
> > index 63c875d3314b..dc44d48415cd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c
> > @@ -91,12 +91,32 @@ static int sha1_ce_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
> > return sha1_base_finish(desc, out);
> > }
> >
> > +static int sha1_ce_export(struct shash_desc *desc, void *out)
> > +{
> > + struct sha1_ce_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
> > +
> > + memcpy(out, sctx, sizeof(struct sha1_state));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sha1_ce_import(struct shash_desc *desc, const void *in)
> > +{
> > + struct sha1_ce_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
> > +
> > + memcpy(sctx, in, sizeof(struct sha1_state));
> > + sctx->finalize = 0;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Can you use '&sctx->sst' instead of 'sctx' so that we aren't relying on the
> 'struct sha1_state' being located at the beginning of the struct?
>
> Likewise for SHA-2.
Yes, I will do that, it is better.
thanks
Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists