linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-master] net: phy: dp83848: Add the TI TLK05/06 PHY ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:40:17 -0500
From:   "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>
CC:     <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-master] net: phy: dp83848: Add the TI TLK05/06 PHY ID

On 2/19/20 1:16 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Add the TLK05/06 PHY ID to the DP83848 driver.  The TI website indicates
> that the DP83822 device is a drop in replacement for the TLK05 device
> but the TLK device does not have WoL support.  The TLK device is
> register compatible to the DP83848 and the DP83848 does not support WoL
> either.  So this PHY can be associated with the DP83848 driver.
> 
> The initial TLKx PHY ID in the driver is a legacy ID and the public data
> sheet indicates a new PHY ID.  So not to break any kernels out there
> both IDs will continue to be supported in this driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/dp83848.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83848.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83848.c
> index 54c7c1b44e4d..66907cfa816a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83848.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83848.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #define TI_DP83620_PHY_ID		0x20005ce0
>  #define NS_DP83848C_PHY_ID		0x20005c90
>  #define TLK10X_PHY_ID			0x2000a210
> +#define TLK105_06_PHY_ID		0x2000a211
>  
>  /* Registers */
>  #define DP83848_MICR			0x11 /* MII Interrupt Control Register */
> @@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ static struct mdio_device_id __maybe_unused dp83848_tbl[] = {
>  	{ NS_DP83848C_PHY_ID, 0xfffffff0 },
>  	{ TI_DP83620_PHY_ID, 0xfffffff0 },
>  	{ TLK10X_PHY_ID, 0xfffffff0 },
> +	{ TLK105_06_PHY_ID, 0xfffffff0 },


If the PHY ID masks out the lowest 4 bits here (they are just revision),
wont we still always match on the base TLK10X_PHY_ID? Does this patch
change anything?

Andrew


>  	{ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(mdio, dp83848_tbl);
> @@ -115,6 +117,8 @@ static struct phy_driver dp83848_driver[] = {
>  			   dp83848_config_init),
>  	DP83848_PHY_DRIVER(TLK10X_PHY_ID, "TI TLK10X 10/100 Mbps PHY",
>  			   NULL),
> +	DP83848_PHY_DRIVER(TLK105_06_PHY_ID, "TI TLK105/06 10/100 Mbps PHY",
> +			   NULL),
>  };
>  module_phy_driver(dp83848_driver);
>  
>