linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:41:32 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Owen Chen <owen.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ryder Lee <Ryder.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <Sean.Wang@...iatek.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        mtk01761 <wendell.lin@...iatek.com>,
        CC Hwang <cc.hwang@...iatek.com>,
        Loda Chou <loda.chou@...iatek.com>,
        Mediatek WSD Upstream <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765

Quoting Matthias Brugger (2020-02-18 08:45:42)
> 
> 
> On 18/02/2020 05:12, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Stephen,
> > 
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43)
> >>>> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC,
> >>>> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application.
> >>>
> >>> Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig
> >>> and dts patches and address Matthias' question?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock parts
> >> send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patches to your
> >> tree?
> >>
> >> Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree.
> >> So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> > 
> > Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too.
> > Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets?
> > The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4?
> > And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7?
> > 
> 
> Yes please do so. I think that's what Stephen referred to.
> 

If those are the ones that aren't dts or defconfig patches sounds good
to me.