linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:23:28 +0800
From:   Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mediatek WSD Upstream <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Loda Chou <loda.chou@...iatek.com>,
        "Fabien Parent" <fparent@...libre.com>,
        Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        "Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ryder Lee <Ryder.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        mtk01761 <wendell.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Owen Chen <owen.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Sean Wang <Sean.Wang@...iatek.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        CC Hwang <cc.hwang@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765

Quoting Matthias Brugger and Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matthias Brugger (2020-02-18 08:45:42)
> > 
> > On 18/02/2020 05:12, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > > 
> > >> Hi Stephen,
> > >>
> > >> On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >>> Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43)
> > >>>> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC,
> > >>>> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application.
> > >>>
> > >>> Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig
> > >>> and dts patches and address Matthias' question?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock parts
> > >> send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patches to your
> > >> tree?
> > >>
> > >> Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree.
> > >> So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4?
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Matthias
> > > 
> > > Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too.
> > > Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets?
> > > The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4?
> > > And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes please do so. I think that's what Stephen referred to.
> > 
> 
> If those are the ones that aren't dts or defconfig patches sounds good
> to me.

Here comes the spilt patch sets.
1. [New] Add basic clock support for mt6765.
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11395997/
2. [PATCH v8] Add basic SoC support for mt6765
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11396019/
  But it's a little bit strange I cannot find patch v8's cover-letter
  in patchwork. Only records which patches has been taken from v7.
  If resend cover-letter is required please let me know.

Regards,
Macpaul Lin