lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200221192419.ce690df36a60d46da5d6d866@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:24:19 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>, artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Fix synth event test to avoid using
 smp_processor_id()

On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:48:01 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:52:29 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Since smp_processor_id() requires irq-disabled or preempt-disabled,
> > synth event generation test module made some warnings. To prevent
> > that, use get_cpu()/put_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> I just noticed this patch, after applying my version that just uses the
> raw_smp_processor_id(). We don't really care what CPU it is do we?
> 
> I didn't want a test to muck with preemption disabling and all that fun.

OK, I confirmed that the ring_buffer_nest_start() ensures the preempt
disabled. So just using raw_smp_processor_id() is good to me.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ