[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200221192419.ce690df36a60d46da5d6d866@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:24:19 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>, artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Fix synth event test to avoid using
smp_processor_id()
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:48:01 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:52:29 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Since smp_processor_id() requires irq-disabled or preempt-disabled,
> > synth event generation test module made some warnings. To prevent
> > that, use get_cpu()/put_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
>
> I just noticed this patch, after applying my version that just uses the
> raw_smp_processor_id(). We don't really care what CPU it is do we?
>
> I didn't want a test to muck with preemption disabling and all that fun.
OK, I confirmed that the ring_buffer_nest_start() ensures the preempt
disabled. So just using raw_smp_processor_id() is good to me.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists