[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <178fd91a-5171-d269-2e8f-bf58e5d98fbe@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:30:04 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: don't obfuscate NULL and error pointers
On 18/02/2020 21.19, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> Looks sensible to me. Without this patch NULL is obfuscated for
> both %p and %pe though. Do you want this patch amended or prefer
> a follow-up for %pe "0000000000000000" -> "NULL" so that it can be
> discussed separately?
Please cc me on all vsprintf.c patches (scripts/get_maintainer.pl should
list me as reviewer), and especially ones that touch the recently added %pe.
Thanks,
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists