linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: NVME: host: core.c: Fixed some coding style issues.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:05:19 +0900
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To:     Edmund Merrow-Smith <edmund@...s.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: NVME: host: core.c: Fixed some coding style
 issues.

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:01:31PM +0000, Edmund Merrow-Smith wrote:
> Fixed a number of style issues highlighted by scripts/checkpatch.pl.
> Mostly whitespace issues, implied int warnings,
> trailing semicolons and line length issues.

But checkpatch.pl is on the wrong side of the 'unsigned'/'unsigned int'
debate! The C standard defined unsigned since forever ago, its usage is
not at all confusing.