lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219145808.GA5147@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 06:58:08 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc:     Edmund Merrow-Smith <edmund@...s.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: NVME: host: core.c: Fixed some coding style
 issues.

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:05:19AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:01:31PM +0000, Edmund Merrow-Smith wrote:
> > Fixed a number of style issues highlighted by scripts/checkpatch.pl.
> > Mostly whitespace issues, implied int warnings,
> > trailing semicolons and line length issues.
> 
> But checkpatch.pl is on the wrong side of the 'unsigned'/'unsigned int'
> debate! The C standard defined unsigned since forever ago, its usage is
> not at all confusing.

Nevermind all the style issues with the patch itself.  Also while I'm
all for clean code - pure cleanup patches are a complete waste of time.
Everyone feel free to clean up obvious warts arounds code that your
are touching for a real fix or feature.  But please stop sending random
cleanup patches.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-nvme mailing list
> linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
---end quoted text---

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ