[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdb72ab9-18d4-5719-2863-78cde4e97fae@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:22:58 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@...at.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 21/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Use ranged-based TLB flush for
dirty log memslot flush
Hello!
On 19.02.2020 0:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use the with_address() variant to when performing a TLB flush for a
^^ is it really needed here?
> specific memslot via kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(), i.e. when
> flushing after clearing dirty bits during KVM_{GET,CLEAR}_DIRTY_LOG.
> This aligns all dirty log memslot-specific TLB flushes to use the
> with_address() variant and paves the way for consolidating the relevant
> code.
>
> Note, moving to the with_address() variant only affects functionality
> when running as a HyperV guest.
>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists