lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfY1Y-jNr=YTfAO+eUOy3xUy9+AgtyJuhEk2ngrxMg5JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:23:25 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Cc:     Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to ci_hdrc.0.ulpi

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:46 AM Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:38:22AM +0000, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On 20-02-17 14:02:57, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > arm64 APQ 8016 SBC ( Dragonboard 410c)  device running Linux next boot
> > > failed due to below error.
> > >
> > > [    0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x410fd030]
> > > [    0.000000] Linux version 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200217 (oe-user@...host)
> > > (gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Feb 17 04:27:31 UTC 2020
> > > [    0.000000] Machine model: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ 8016 SBC
> > > <>
> > > [    4.439291] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.448891] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.457879] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.467331] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.475636] mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
> > > [    4.478895] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 DS2008 7.28 GiB
> > > [    4.480629] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 DS2008 partition 1 4.00 MiB
> > > [    4.484719] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 DS2008 partition 2 4.00 MiB
> > > [    4.492247] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.502611] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 DS2008 partition 3 4.00 MiB,
> > > chardev (234:0)
> > > [    4.506949] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.517901] random: fast init done
> > > [    4.521420] mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR104 SDHC card at address aaaa
> > > [    4.523400] mmcblk1: mmc1:aaaa SL16G 14.8 GiB
> > > [    4.532843] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.539131]  mmcblk0: p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 p11 p12 p13 p14
> > > [    4.542309]  mmcblk1: p1
> > > [    4.561843] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.573481] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.585283] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.592622] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.600074] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.607204] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> > > [    4.614679] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to
> > > ci_hdrc.0.ulpi
> >
> > The chipidea USB code hasn't changed recently. Would you please bisect
> > which commit affect it?
>
> Probably same cause as for this:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206435

Yes, it's the same. I dunno why no fix yet available.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ