linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pwm: bcm2835: Dynamically allocate base

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Feb 2020 22:07:18 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:PWM SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..." 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: bcm2835: Dynamically allocate base

[Dropping Bart Tanghe from recipents as the address bounces]

Hello Thierry,

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:14:00AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 2/4/20 1:17 AM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 13:35 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> The newer 2711 and 7211 chips have two PWM controllers and failure to
> >> dynamically allocate the PWM base would prevent the second PWM
> >> controller instance being probed for succeeding with an -EEXIST error
> >> from alloc_pwms().
> >>
> >> Fixes: e5a06dc5ac1f ("pwm: Add BCM2835 PWM driver")
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> 
> Thierry, is there any chance we can get this applied for an upcoming
> 5.6-rcX? Thank you!

to assist you with patch sorting:

# revisions < v6 of "Convert period and duty cycle to u64"
pwclient -s Superseded 1237020 1237019 1229049 1229050 1222396

# most of "Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625" v5 isn't for pwm
pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1238908 1238907 1238906 1238904 1238903 1238901

# most of "Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625" v4 isn't for pwm
pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1224598 1224597 1224596 1224594 1224593 1224592
pwclient -s "Superseeded" 1224595

# "backlight: pwm_bl: Use gpiod_get_value_cansleep() to get initial
# state" already applied by Lee Jones
pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1031586

# Problem resolved by Michal Vokáč
pwclient -s "Rejected"  1059267

(Not sure "Rejected" is the right state.)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |