lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:37:05 -0700 From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "open list:PWM SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..." <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: bcm2835: Dynamically allocate base On 2/20/2020 1:07 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > [Dropping Bart Tanghe from recipents as the address bounces] > > Hello Thierry, > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:14:00AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 2/4/20 1:17 AM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: >>> On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 13:35 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>> The newer 2711 and 7211 chips have two PWM controllers and failure to >>>> dynamically allocate the PWM base would prevent the second PWM >>>> controller instance being probed for succeeding with an -EEXIST error >>>> from alloc_pwms(). >>>> >>>> Fixes: e5a06dc5ac1f ("pwm: Add BCM2835 PWM driver") >>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> >>>> --- >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de> >> >> Thierry, is there any chance we can get this applied for an upcoming >> 5.6-rcX? Thank you! > > to assist you with patch sorting: > > # revisions < v6 of "Convert period and duty cycle to u64" > pwclient -s Superseded 1237020 1237019 1229049 1229050 1222396 > > # most of "Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625" v5 isn't for pwm > pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1238908 1238907 1238906 1238904 1238903 1238901 > > # most of "Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625" v4 isn't for pwm > pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1224598 1224597 1224596 1224594 1224593 1224592 > pwclient -s "Superseeded" 1224595 > > # "backlight: pwm_bl: Use gpiod_get_value_cansleep() to get initial > # state" already applied by Lee Jones > pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1031586 > > # Problem resolved by Michal Vokáč > pwclient -s "Rejected" 1059267 > > (Not sure "Rejected" is the right state.) Thierry, can we get this patch included in v5.7? I have not seen it show up in linux-next yet. Thank you! -- Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists