linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] i2c: of: reserve unknown and ancillary addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX+SJPTvDqKDwD_3DaAxDT3KcEbcjLNjj4JsbcpRwd92w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:15:04 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc:     Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran@...uared.org.uk>,
        Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
        Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] i2c: of: reserve unknown and ancillary addresses

Hi Wolfram,

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:26 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> One outcome of my dynamic address assignment RFC series[1] was that we
> need a way to describe an I2C bus in DT fully. This includes unknown
> devices and devices requiring multiple addresses. This series implements
> that.
>
> Patches 1+2 do some preparational refactoring. After patch 3, we can
> have child nodes with an address, but no compatible. Those addresses
> will be marked busy now. They are handled by the dummy driver as well,
> but named "reserved" instead of dummy. Patches 4+5 are again some
> preparational refactoring. After patch 6, all addresses in a 'reg' array
> are now blocked by the I2C core, also using the dummy driver but named
> "reserved". So, we can have something like this:
>
>         dummy@13 {

Hence should that be "reserved@13"?

>                reg = <0x13>, <0x14>;
>         };

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds