[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7dec8c6eb07f634a4cccec3be5136e2f@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:13:58 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/irqdomain: Make sure all irq domain flags are
distinct
On 2020-02-21 02:07, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> This was noticed when printing debugfs for MSIs on my ARM64 server.
> The new dstate IRQD_MSI_NOMASK_QUIRK came out surprisingly while it
> should only be the x86 stuff for the time being...
>
> It's the overlap in irqdomain flags which leads to this confusion.
> (1 << 1) might be a good choice for old IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED,
> use it to avoid this overlap.
>
> Fixes: 6f1a4891a592 ("x86/apic/msi: Plug non-maskable MSI affinity
> race")
To be fair, the real source of the bug is this:
6a6544e520abe ("genirq/irqdomain: Remove auto-recursive hierarchy
support")
> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index b2d47571ab67..8d062e86d954 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ enum {
> IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_HIERARCHY = (1 << 0),
>
> /* Irq domain name was allocated in __irq_domain_add() */
> - IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED = (1 << 6),
> + IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED = (1 << 1),
>
> /* Irq domain is an IPI domain with virq per cpu */
> IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_IPI_PER_CPU = (1 << 2),
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Thomas, do you mind picking this one up, as I don't have anything
else for the time being?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists