[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b47c043-5fa5-3ae5-6c97-e2532dcff80e@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:12:31 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Add EMULTYPE_PF when emulation is
triggered by a page fault
On 20/02/20 21:11, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> How about naming it as EMULTYPE_PF_ALLOW_RETRY and exchanging the bit
>> position with EMULTYPE_PF ?
> Hmm, EMULTYPE_PF_ALLOW_RETRY does sound better. I'm on the fence regarding
> shuffling the bits. If I were to shuffle the bits, I'd do a more thorough
> reorder so that the #UD and #PF types are consecutive, e.g.
Let's just change the name, I can do it.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists