lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5626891-82f6-0a0c-401c-89a901a8455d@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:14:03 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: Move #PF retry tracking variables into
 emulation context

On 19/02/20 16:16, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> The easy solution to that is to move retry_instruction() into emulate.c.
> That would also allow making x86_page_table_writing_insn() static.  All
> other functions invoked from retry_instruction() are exposed via kvm_host.h.

emulate.c is supposed to invoke no (or almost no) function outside the
ctxt->ops struct.  In particular, retry_instruction() invokes
kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write and kvm_mmu_unprotect_page.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ