[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5626891-82f6-0a0c-401c-89a901a8455d@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:14:03 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: Move #PF retry tracking variables into
emulation context
On 19/02/20 16:16, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> The easy solution to that is to move retry_instruction() into emulate.c.
> That would also allow making x86_page_table_writing_insn() static. All
> other functions invoked from retry_instruction() are exposed via kvm_host.h.
emulate.c is supposed to invoke no (or almost no) function outside the
ctxt->ops struct. In particular, retry_instruction() invokes
kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write and kvm_mmu_unprotect_page.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists