lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200222162208.GA26320@sasha-vm>
Date:   Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:22:08 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
        Oleg Kravtsov <oleg@...era.com>,
        Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 188/191] cifs: log warning message (once) if out of
 disk space

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>On Fri 2020-02-21 08:42:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> From: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit d6fd41905ec577851734623fb905b1763801f5ef ]
>>
>> We ran into a confusing problem where an application wasn't checking
>> return code on close and so user didn't realize that the application
>> ran out of disk space.  log a warning message (once) in these
>> cases. For example:
>>
>>   [ 8407.391909] Out of space writing to \\oleg-server\small-share
>
>Out of space can happen on any filesystem, and yes, it can be
>confusing. But why is cifs so special that we warn here (and not

cifs isn't special, we tend to take this type of patches that address
usability issues. Here's an example of a similar patch for btrfs from
the previous release (3 days ago):

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.5.y&id=eb7a7968c9ee183def1d727d4bb209c701fe402a
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.5.y&id=f7447ff1d58a590e4b04479d1209fcee253a96d7

>elsewhere) and why was this marked for stable?

Reading the patch description, it describes a bug that happened because
of lacking kernel feedback.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ