[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200222190201.GC26320@sasha-vm>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:02:01 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 011/191] nfsd4: avoid NULL deference on strange COPY
compounds
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:51:04AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>> With cross-server COPY we've introduced the possibility that the current
>> or saved filehandle might not have fh_dentry/fh_export filled in, but we
>> missed a place that assumed it was. I think this could be triggered by
>> a compound like:
>>
>> PUTFH(foreign filehandle)
>> GETATTR
>> SAVEFH
>> COPY
>>
>> First, check_if_stalefh_allowed sets no_verify on the first (PUTFH) op.
>> Then op_func = nfsd4_putfh runs and leaves current_fh->fh_export NULL.
>> need_wrongsec_check returns true, since this PUTFH has OP_IS_PUTFH_LIKE
>> set and GETATTR does not have OP_HANDLES_WRONGSEC set.
>>
>> We should probably also consider tightening the checks in
>> check_if_stalefh_allowed and double-checking that we don't assume the
>> filehandle is verified elsewhere in the compound. But I think this
>> fixes the immediate issue.
>>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>> Fixes: 4e48f1cccab3 "NFSD: allow inter server COPY to have... "
>
>AFAICT 4e48f1cccab3 "NFSD: allow inter server COPY to have... " is not
>part of 4.19 series, so this should not be needed in 4.19.
Not only 4e48f1cccab3 isn't in 4.19, it isn't in any tree! :)
Looks like an error in the patch, I'll drop this commit from everywhere.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists