[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224220031.GC77839@google.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:00:31 -0800
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chao@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: avoid unneeded barrier in do_checkpoint()
On 02/19, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/2/19 10:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 02/18, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> We don't need to wait all dirty page submitting IO twice,
> >> remove unneeded wait step.
> >
> > What happens if checkpoint and other meta writs are reordered?
>
> checkpoint can be done as following:
>
> 1. All meta except last cp-park of checkpoint area.
> 2. last cp-park of checkpoint area
>
> So we only need to keep barrier in between step 1 and 2, we don't need
> to care about the write order of meta in step 1, right?
Ah, let me integrate this patch into Sahitya's patch.
f2fs: fix the panic in do_checkpoint()
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 --
> >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> index 751815cb4c2b..9c88fb3d255a 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> @@ -1384,8 +1384,6 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>
> >> /* Flush all the NAT/SIT pages */
> >> f2fs_sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO);
> >> - /* Wait for all dirty meta pages to be submitted for IO */
> >> - f2fs_wait_on_all_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * modify checkpoint
> >> --
> >> 2.18.0.rc1
> > .
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists