[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3aeabddc82ca86e3dca9c26081a0077@walle.cc>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:53:34 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: xiaowei.bao@....com, Zhiqiang.Hou@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, leoyang.li@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
minghuan.Lian@....com, mingkai.hu@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
roy.zang@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] arm64: dts: ls1028a: Add PCIe controller DT nodes
Hi Shawn, all,
Am 2020-02-24 09:43, schrieb Shawn Guo:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:11:05AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Hi Xiaowei, Hi Shawn,
>>
>> > LS1028a implements 2 PCIe 3.0 controllers.
>>
>> Patch 1/3 and 3/3 are in Linus' tree but nobody seems to care about
>> this patch
>> anymore :(
>>
>> This doesn't work well with the IOMMU, because the iommu-map property
>> is
>> missing. The bootloader needs the &smmu phandle to fixup the entry.
>> See
>> below.
>>
>> Shawn, will you add this patch to your tree once its fixed,
>> considering it
>> just adds the device tree node for the LS1028A?
>
> The patch/thread is a bit aged. You may want to send an updated patch
> for discussion.
So should I just pick up the patch add my two fixes and send it again?
What about
the Signed-off-by tags? Leave them? Replace them? Add mine?
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists