linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 21/25] smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1582558491.12738.36.camel@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:34:51 -0600
From:   Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 21/25] smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the
 conditional function

On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:52 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-02-21 15:24:49 [-0600], zanussi@...nel.org wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> > 
> > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> This alone makes no sense. I had this in the devel tree as part of a
> three patch series to remove a limitation in on_each_cpu_cond_mask().
> This does not apply to the v4.14 series due to lack of the
> on_each_cpu_cond_mask() function.
> 

Yeah, I did drop the on_each_cpu_cond_mask() versions, but the typedef
itself seemed like a nice innocuous cleanup.  Will drop though as it's
really unnecessary.

Thanks,

Tom

> Sebastian