linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 20/25] kmemleak: Cosmetic changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200224155234.brdcpecpfboyjjon@linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:52:34 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 20/25] kmemleak: Cosmetic changes

On 2020-02-24 09:18:23 [-0600], Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > What should be applied instead is
> > 	fb2c57edcb943 ("kmemleak: Change the lock of kmemleak_object to
> > raw_spinlock_t")
> > 
> 
> I did apply that patch (as patch 14/25 of this series).  This patch
> seemed like it was adding some comment bits mised for that one, which
> is all it does.

Bah. So I saw that (#14/25), considered okay but while looking at this
patch I was comparing against v4.14.164-rt73 and forgot about it…

> Thanks,
> 
> Tom

Sebastian.