[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877e0an763.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:11:16 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: vmx: Use basic exit reason to check if it's the specific VM EXIT
Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com> writes:
>
> We have a macro for bit 31,
>
> VMX_EXIT_REASONS_FAILED_VMENTRY 0x80000000
>
>
> Does it make sense to define a macro like that instead ? Say,
>
> VMX_BASIC_EXIT_REASON 0x0000ffff
>
0xffffU ?
> and then we do,
>
> u32 exit_reason = vmx->exit_reason;
> u16 basic_exit_reason = exit_reason & VMX_BASIC_EXIT_REASON;
>
Just a naming suggestion: if we decide to go down this road, let's name
it e.g. VMX_BASIC_EXIT_REASON_MASK to make it clear this is *not* an
exit reason.
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists