linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: vmx: Use basic exit reason to check if it's the specific VM EXIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f109f89d-ec69-4651-140b-24cc0be233d2@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:28:25 -0800
From:   Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: vmx: Use basic exit reason to check if it's the
 specific VM EXIT


On 2/25/20 5:11 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com> writes:
>
>> We have a macro for bit 31,
>>
>>       VMX_EXIT_REASONS_FAILED_VMENTRY                0x80000000
>>
>>
>> Does it make sense to define a macro like that instead ? Say,
>>
>>       VMX_BASIC_EXIT_REASON        0x0000ffff
>>
> 0xffffU ?
>
>> and then we do,
>>
>>       u32 exit_reason = vmx->exit_reason;
>>       u16 basic_exit_reason = exit_reason & VMX_BASIC_EXIT_REASON;
>>
> Just a naming suggestion: if we decide to go down this road, let's name
> it e.g. VMX_BASIC_EXIT_REASON_MASK to make it clear this is *not* an
> exit reason.
>

VMX_BASIC_EXIT_REASON_MASK  works.