linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer v6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDN-XP7LAyy-zQ-J=nxv5M1x_f2AZ2qJ8CK6B82f5WwYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:28:16 +0100
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load
 balancer v6

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 12:59, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:16:41PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
> >
> > > The only differences in V6 are due to Vincent's latest patch series.
> > >
> > > This is V5 which includes the latest versions of Vincent's patch
> > > addressing review feedback. Patches 4-9 are Vincent's work plus one
> > > important performance fix. Vincent's patches were retested and while
> > > not presented in detail, it was mostly an improvement.
> > >
> > > Changelog since V5:
> > > o Import Vincent's latest patch set
> >
> > >  include/linux/sched.h        |  31 ++-
> > >  include/trace/events/sched.h |  49 ++--
> > >  kernel/sched/core.c          |  13 -
> > >  kernel/sched/debug.c         |  17 +-
> > >  kernel/sched/fair.c          | 626 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > >  kernel/sched/pelt.c          |  59 ++--
> > >  kernel/sched/sched.h         |  42 ++-
> > >  7 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 302 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied to tip:sched/core for v5.7 inclusion, thanks Mel and Vincent!
> >
>
> Thanks!
>
> > Please base future iterations on top of a0f03b617c3b (current
> > sched/core).
> >
>
> Will do.
>
> However I noticed that "sched/fair: Fix find_idlest_group() to handle
> CPU affinity" did not make it to tip/sched/core. Peter seemed to think it
> was fine. Was it rejected or is it just sitting in Peter's queue somewhere?

The patch has already reached mainline through tip/sched-urgent-for-linus

>
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs