linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer v6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:24:30 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load
 balancer v6

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 02:28:16PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >
> > Will do.
> >
> > However I noticed that "sched/fair: Fix find_idlest_group() to handle
> > CPU affinity" did not make it to tip/sched/core. Peter seemed to think it
> > was fine. Was it rejected or is it just sitting in Peter's queue somewhere?
> 
> The patch has already reached mainline through tip/sched-urgent-for-linus
> 

Bah, I pasted the wrong subject. I am thinking of your
patch "sched/fair: fix statistics for find_idlest_group" --
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200218144534.4564-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/
It still appears to be relevant or did I miss something else?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs