[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202002250730.62F9BD642A@keescook>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:31:13 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Security Module list
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/8] bpf: lsm: provide attachment points for
BPF LSM programs
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:41:27PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> I'm proposing to rename BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM into BPF_PROG_TYPE_OVERRIDE_RETURN.
Isn't the type used to decide which validator to use?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists