[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h7zdp0kv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:15:12 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/15] x86/entry: Provide IDTEnTRY_SYSVEC
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> writes:
> On 2/25/20 2:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Provide a IDTENTRY variant for system vectors to consolidate the differnt
>> mechanisms to emit the ASM stubs for 32 an 64 bit.
>
> $SUBJECT has an obvious typo.
Indeed.
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
>> @@ -1261,6 +1261,10 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(asm_\cfunc)
>> SYM_CODE_END(asm_\cfunc)
>> .endm
>>
>> +.macro idtentry_sysvec vector cfunc
>> + idtentry \vector asm_\cfunc \cfunc has_error_code=0
>> +.endm
>
> irq_stack?
System vectors have never used irq stacks.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists