linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] KVM: Pre-allocate 1 cpumask variable per cpu for both pv tlb and pv ipis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:10:56 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] KVM: Pre-allocate 1 cpumask variable per cpu for both pv tlb and pv ipis

Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> writes:

> (putting Paolo in To: field, in case email filters are to blame.
> Vitaly, maybe you could ping Paolo internally?)
>

I could, but the only difference from what I'm doing right now would
proabbly be the absence of non-@...aht.com emails in To/Cc: fields of
this email :-)

Do we want this fix for one of the last 5.6 RCs or 5.7 would be fine?
Personally, I'd say we're not in a great hurry and 5.7 is OK.

-- 
Vitaly