[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9506da2d-53fb-c4a3-55b4-fb78e185e9c2@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:26:58 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] KVM: Pre-allocate 1 cpumask variable per
cpu for both pv tlb and pv ipis
On 26/02/20 14:10, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> writes:
>
>> (putting Paolo in To: field, in case email filters are to blame.
>> Vitaly, maybe you could ping Paolo internally?)
>>
>
> I could, but the only difference from what I'm doing right now would
> proabbly be the absence of non-@...aht.com emails in To/Cc: fields of
> this email :-)
>
> Do we want this fix for one of the last 5.6 RCs or 5.7 would be fine?
> Personally, I'd say we're not in a great hurry and 5.7 is OK.
I think we can do it for 5.6, but we're not in a great hurry. :) The
rc4 pull request was already going to be relatively large and I had just
been scolded by Linus so I postponed this, but I am going to include it
this week.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists